By W.R. Jones
This falls under the “are you shitting me” umbrella. I just read where a jury awarded a motorcycle rider 8.9 Million dollars because he was injured when his bike hit a wild boar crossing the road.
So his attorney’s argument was that the state or county or whatever were responsible. They should have known the hogs posed a risk.
Really, how is it that they drum up a passel of stupid jurors so often? And can’t the judge just tell the balif to shoot all the jurors as they are too stupid to be wandering the streets. They pose a danger to moroncycle riders.
Wild animals are unpredictable about crossing roads – DUH. Imagine if a group suggested shooting all the wild boars as they pose a risk to drivers. You can feel the national outcry.
So, if we are concerned with saving our ornately tattooed motorcycle riders, shouldn’t we shoot all the deer, elk, coyotes, squirrels, cats and dogs, and children under the age of 18. They pose a danger of running amok in the streets that clearly belong to the moroncycle riders.
My KINGDOM for a person with COMMON sense.
Did hims hurt hims self? Let mumkins get an attorney for baby boy.